Military Whistleblowers Report 1,048 % Increase In Nervous System Diseases in 2021
(Arjun Walia) Three military doctors have claimed that data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) shows a significant increase in registered diagnoses (on DMED) for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five year average from 2016-2020.
Dr’s. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long released affidavits as whistleblowers under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act.
Thomas Renz, the attorney who is representing these whistleblowers, stated that registered diagnosis for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021. He did so at a roundtable discussion featuring a number of renowned doctors and medical experts who shared their perspectives on COVID-19 inoculation efficacy and safety. Below are some of the the numbers.
Hypertension – 2,181% increase
Disease of the nervous system – 1,048% increase
Malignant neoplasms of esophagus – 894% increase
Multiple sclerosis – 680% increase
Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs – 624% increase
Guillain-Barre syndrome – 551% increase
Breast cancer – 487% increase
Demyelinating – 487% increase
Malignant neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands – 474% increase
Female infertility – 472% increase
Pulmonary embolism – 468% increase
Migraines – 452% increase
Ovarian dysfunction – 437% increase
Testicular cancer – 369% increase
Tachycardia – 302% increase
United States Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin wrote a letter to the current Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III expressing the information above, as well as the fact that,
“Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnosis of myocarditis has been removed from the database. Following the the allegation that the DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all records referring, relating, or reported to DMED. I have yet to hear whether you have complied with this request.”
In the affidavit from Dr. Peter Chambers he eludes to the potentiality of COVID vaccination being a potential cause for the rise of these numbers. He states,
“Current study of regulations, and after discussions with legal counsel has elucidated to many, to include myself, that it would make it an unlawful order to follow a mandate that does not allow for true informed consent as the current vaccine available is still in a phase three trial and offers no guidance per package insert or otherwise. The predominance of evidence exhibiting the untoward effects of this vaccine administration procedure, overwhelmingly will not allow me to allow harm to come to my soldiers, colleagues or any civilian I advise.”
This information joins a growing body of evidence that there have been an increase in health related issues since the onset of COVID-19 vaccines. While we can’t immediately jump to causation, this is an important safety signal we must continue to follow.
Vaccine injury reports have been a common theme throughout this pandemic. By Oct 15, 2021, adverse events reported worldwide passed 2,344,240 for COVID vaccines in the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system VigiAccess. These include serious adverse reactions like deaths, permanent disabilities, hospitalizations and emergency room visits to very mild reactions as well. Approximately 50 percent of vaccine injuries reported to VAERS in the last 30 years are all from COVID vaccines. Documents released in November show Pfizer was aware of over 50K serious COVID vaccine reactions within months of distribution.
That said, stories like this have largely been left out of legacy media coverage making people unaware of its prevalence.
As this new information continually comes out, we also now see a new bulletin from The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that states American citizens sharing ‘misinformation’ about COVID-19 could be considered domestic terrorism. The DHS feels that the free and open sharing of ‘misinformation’ is undermining public trust in governing institutions.
Is the DHS seeking to act like a ‘ministry of truth?’ Who will decide what is true and what isn’t? Throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, legitimate information has been subjected to “fact checking” and censoring.
Given the amount of independent journalists with access to millions of people online, full transparency on important information appears to have become a threat to big corporations and governments who have often enjoyed less pressure from investigating minds.
The positive aspect to the age of censorship is that more and more people are seeing how widespread it actually is. It’s becoming more and more obvious.
