6 Suspicious Things You Need to Know About the 2020 Election
(Will Justice) With each passing day from last week’s election, more and more evidence is coming out that is making many highly suspicious.
Here are just 6 of the dozens of things you can quickly find online, many of which are verified, evidence-based—and even more alarmingly—totally ignored by the Democrats and mainstream media.
1. Over 2 Million Trump Votes deleted or switched to Biden.
In a tweet, Trump quotes Chanel Rion of the OAN who reports that Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes. 221,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden.
She also says 941,000 votes were deleted and that states using dominion voting systems switched 435,000 votes fro Trump to Biden.
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2020
The mainstream media maintains that there’s no proof of widespread voter fraud on the part of Dominion but this doesn’t appear to be true.
According to Diane Richard of New Right Network:
Dominion Voting System has become a widely discussed topic in this election cycle. Without free and fair elections, the freedoms and liberties we Americans enjoy are dissipating into a web of corruption. Bit by bit, falsely elected officials place their surrogates at every level of government. A fraudulent election officer with nearly unchecked authority becomes the cog in a wheel that will misappropriate public funds and cause inappropriate policies to be put into place throughout the government while they enrich themselves. It’s all about money and control. (source)
2. Nancy Pelosi Chief of Staff and Diane Feinstein’s husband owns major stake in Dominion.
In last week’s “Where’s the Hope” newsletter, we mentioned the DOMINION Ballot counting software whose convenient “glitches” in multiple states may have severely tilted the elections in a certain direction, as the days roll on we are learning a lot more about the company and those attached to it. Sidney Powell was on Mornings with Maria and she unloaded on the monstrous amount of Democrat voter fraud in the 2020 election. But during this discussion Maria Bartiromo dropped a bomb as well, stating:
“…I’ve also seen reports that Nancy Pelosi’s longtime Chief of Staff is a key executive of that company. Richard Bloom, Senator Feinstein’s husband is a significant shareholder of this company.”
Truly a bold statement, but It turns out that Bartiromo may indeed be correct. Bloomberg reported in April, 2019 that:
“Dominion Voting Systems — which commands more than a third of the voting-machine market without having Washington lobbyists — has hired its first, a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi.”
In addition, we’ve now learned that Democrat Diane Feinstein’s husband does have a major stake in Dominion via 6 different holding companies each at 10% making a grand total of 60% stake
And on top of all that, we also know that Dominion has ties to the Clinton Foundation.
Here’s the link to see for yourself:
3. The same “free and fair” election software, Dominion, was used in the infamous Vote Flipping Venezuela election.
Vote Flipping is when votes for one candidate mysteriously get flipped to another candidate. This “glitch” seems to always favor the establishment candidate.
Given that the vote is one of the few and most powerful ways a citizen can declare their will and participate in the government, it’s not surprising that there’s a history of manipulation.
As the infamous and murderous dictator said, Joseph Stalin, is credited with saying: “It’s not the people who vote that count, it’s the people who count the votes.”
An article on the American Thinker shares the story.
Flipped votes in computer systems? The last time we heard about that was in Venezuela’s 2004 fraud-plagued recall referendum on then-President Hugo Chavez. Millions and millions of Venezuelans marched in the streets against him , and then when the recall referendum was held, it failed hugely, something that seemed very strange given the size of the crowds. That was the fiasco that official election observer Jimmy Carter praised so highly as free and fair “despite what went on in the totalization room” according to the Carter Center report. After that, computer scientists from Amherst, Stanford, U.C. Santa Cruz, Johns Hopkins, and Harvard all found evidence of vote flipping statistically speaking. Besides their conclusions that it was a statistical impossibility, a well-known pollster, Penn, Schoen & Berland, taking exit polls at the same referendum found that 60% were in favor of throwing Chavez out, and 40% favored keeping him. Much to his surprise, the scorecard came out in almost the exact reverse, 58-42. Flipped.
And there are machines that flip votes. It’s one reason why many, such as Instapundit’s Glenn Reynolds, thinks only a return to paper ballots and in-person voting will restore confidence in flawed electoral systems.
According to this fascinating thread of apparently conservative coders and engineers, the sense is that the fraud wasn’t directly written into the code, which would have been easy to detect. More likely, it was embedded into the compiler, deep into the back-end of the computer program. They wrote:
EastBlocSurplus 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0
I think it’s unlikely to be hidden in a human-readable language like Java, C, Perl, C++, etc. almost anybody could read that and point it out. I think it’s much more likely that any incipiencies would be hidden in a compiler (perhaps to reassign addition operations to adjust by some fraction), assembly/machine code, or the chip itself. Very few people in industry would want to open Pandora’s box to inspect those elements, even fewer would be qualified/able to inspect.
and this too:
–zerofoo 1 point 5 hours ago +1 / -0
Easy to test. Feed the counting software various known quantities of votes and check against the computed counts.
Same way weights and measures departments test gas pumps for tampering. They pull random amounts of fuel from the pumps, weigh them and check against the pump meter.
This should be easy to discover. We need to secure the counting machines now.
parent permalink save report block reply
–EastBlocSurplus 1 point 3 hours ago +1 / -0
If I were in the business of creating fraudulent election machines, I’d make the fraud dependent on the date. You could see months in advance that counts on November 3rd or 4th would be the ones to be falsified. So if you’re a fraudster designing a counting system, and someone is counting ballots a week later, then it’s probably a test or recount and the machine should give the true number while Biden relies on the media to shutdown or ignore recount. Assigning this omnipotence and foresight to developers and engineers is 100% a slippery slope, but if we could see it coming then the chances are that they could too. That’s why Trump is so devastating to the career politicians: corruption works best when people do what you expect them to. At the moment, the media expects right wing violence to cover up an honest investigation so we cannot give them the distraction they need.
parent permalink save report block reply
–Deeprasmith 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0
Probably the instructions are embedded at chip level like opcodes inside CPU. It gets activated via Internet. They have found router with Internet access attached to those machines.
parent permalink save report block reply
–RegularAmerican 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0
The machines worked just as intended.
parent permalink save report block reply
–publ1us 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0
There are bugs but they definitely don’t look like this and they get their contracts cancelled rather than used by 30/50 states.
As Andrea Widburg noted in her excellent piece here, the company name for these vote-flipping machines, is named Dominion.
…
So in short, Venezuelan-led Smartmatic bought U.S.-based Sequoia, put its technology into Sequoia, and then sold it to Dominion. Dominion denies having anything to do with Smartmatic now, though at one point it allowed Smartmatic to market its same technology abroad in places where Dominion didn’t do business (they got into a lawsuit over Puerto Rico), but the bottom line is that the technology is all the same because it was all the same company.
4. In Pennsylvania, Mail-in ballots appear to have been received before they were mailed out.
According to a Twitter user with the handle V_C_435, 109,421 ballots were received before they were mailed. Each suspicious ballot was marked red in the below plot.
Pennsylvania data shows that some of the mail in ballots were returned BEFORE they were mailed, on the same day or next day. I marked such ballots as "Suspicious" (RED) in the plot. There are 109421 (3.53%) "Suspicious" ballots. @DatElefan @Peoples_Pundit @shylockh pic.twitter.com/CbEeKTaGHL
— V_C_435 (@VC4351) November 8, 2020
The data was pulled from this government website (https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm).
Most of the ballots come from the Philadelphia and Lehigh area, around 44%.
Pennsylvania data shows that some of the mail in ballots were returned BEFORE they were mailed, on the same day or next day. I marked such ballots as "Suspicious" (RED) in the plot. There are 109421 (3.53%) "Suspicious" ballots. @DatElefan @Peoples_Pundit @shylockh pic.twitter.com/CbEeKTaGHL
— V_C_435 (@VC4351) November 8, 2020
5. The Maricopa County GOP resigned after failing to appear for a vote machine test in October.
Rae Chornenky, Maricopa County Repulican chair stepped down from her post a week after the November 3rd election. Her resignation came after it was publically revealed that she failed to appear for a voting machine test in October, as reported by ABC 15 in Arizona.
A lawsuit challenging of the official vote count of Maricopa County, one of several hotly contested counties in the country, was filed by the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee.
🚨BREAKING: The Maricopa County GOP chair has stepped down from her post after it was publicly revealed she was a no-show at a voting machine test in October. https://t.co/SpiYqWHssC
— The Election Wizard🧙♂️ (@Wizard_Predicts) November 12, 2020
6. Tucker Carlson says at least 25 dead people voted.
According to the NY Post, Fox News host reported on Wednesday that 25 people reached from beyond the grave to cast their vote in the 2020 election.
Carlson assured his audience that the facts presented were miticously checked and provable.
“What we’re about to tell you is accurate. It’s not a theory. It happened, and we can prove it. Other news organizations could prove it, too. They’ve simply chosen not to,” Carlson said on the program.
All these points and more make a lot of people very suspicious of the election. And even more so, the fact the mainstream media seems to ignore claims that there were mass voting irragularires have also make people suspicious.
How can a candidate be deamed the Presisdent Elect, when they haven’t been confirmed or certified yet?