FBI Ignores Evidence In Las Vegas
According to True Pundit, the FBI along with the Las Vegas Metro Police Department, did not follow all the credible leads which seem to point to at least one other shooter working along side Stephen Paddock inside the hotel suite on October 1st, 2017.
An FBI insiders and intelligence official source of the online news magazine has confirmed that the investigation was railroaded by top brass at the FBI. When they were provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen, they told agents to stand down and focus on Stephen Paddock only.
The source says that low level investigators were told to relax, and not follow all the clues. With superiors instructing law enforcement officers not to follow all the leads, we are left to think that something was being covered up. The leaks come from seasoned investigators who say the investigation is tainted for reasons far above their pay grades. Law enforcement officers are trained to hunt and find bad guys and when their own bosses become an obstacle to that process — especially in a high-profile case like this one — suspicions begin to spill over.
Law Enforcement has publicly refused to consider a possible second shooter theory. Yet, video evidence seems to suggest that Paddock did not act alone, with multiple guns going off near the Mandalay Bay at the same time. Also, eyewitness testimony of multiple shootings going on all over Las Vegas that night.
Also this week, Laura Loomer released her "exclusive" article claiming that members of Congress were briefed this week in regards to the Las Vegas Shooting at the Route 91 Harvest festival. Her source claims the briefing involved evidence that ISIS was involved in the October 1st shooting and there where at least two shooters involved. The source also claims evidence points to possible Mexican Mafia ties (Jesus Campos), with ISIS bringing their assassins through a soft border entrance. This would explain why ISIS claimed responsibility shortly after the shooting occurred, which amazingly have a 94% claim of accuracy rating in regards to their terror acts according to Associated Press.
Based on videos obtained by the FBI, season intelligence experts and FBI insiders recommended detailed acoustic analysis of the entire event “with constructive interference and noise generation of sound waves within the rifle reports post-filtering the audio stream for the numerous echoes and other noise,” according to one well placed FBI insider, who continued explaining the rational to a True Pundit reporter:
“Sub-optimized due to non-synchronous firing of weapons, this constructive interference actually creates sound amplification spikes (loudness) in the sound waves themselves and this would indicate the presence of a second shooter. This phenomenon would be best captured from audio/video devices close to the Mandalay Bay firing points.”
But the FBI brass in Las Vegas, headed by Special Agent in Charge Aaron Rouse, never green lighted such analysis. In fact, according to sources, the FBI has largely ignored such rudimentary investigative steps. Agents who wanted to pursue this were redirected to focus on Paddock, as the FBI brass wanted to build a lone wolf and lone shooter narrative, absent investigative leads pointing elsewhere.
The FBI’s “official” narrative to date: Paddock was a mysterious maniac. A habitual gambler who snapped, bought guns and went off. And no one knows why.
But intelligence veterans maintain the video tells a much different narrative.
At the very beginning of the attached video, there are two distinct streams of fire appear to be discernible, a well-place intelligence official said.
“The first five audible shots appear to originate from a first shooter who pauses after these first five shots,” the intelligence veteran said. “The second possible shooter — who is firing at a much higher rate of speed and for a longer duration — follows immediately thereafter. The first shooter then begins firing again at the same time as the second shooter but at a noticeably slower rate. All of this takes place within the first five seconds of the video.
“These seemingly disparate sound streams cannot logically come from the same weapon, fired at the same time, by the same lone shooter. One of the areas of keen interest is the acoustics and sounds that are being stripped and separated using highly sophisticated programs that digitally lay down the signature for each sound emission or in this case, each shot, from each gun and from every potential angle."
Source: True Pundit, Laura Loomer
